Yesterday was the two year anniversary of the day Aaron Greenspan doxxed me. When it first happened I thought “What’s the big deal? Does it really matter if people know my name and address?”. I had no idea the insane lengths Aaron Greenspan would go to in order to try and make my life miserable, keep me quiet, and incite harassment from a swarm of anonymous online trolls. What I didn’t realize is what a loser Aaron Greenspan is, and how he will spend all day trying to hurt people because he has no friends, no real job, and nothing better to do.
To commemorate this two year anniversary, here are 229 tweets Aaron Greenspan wrote about me since the day he doxxed me. This doesn’t include everything –– only what came up when I searched my name. Tweets about me that don’t have my name are excluded, as is all offline harassment such as phone calls, e-mails, court filings, etc. It also doesn’t include Greenspan’s harassment of other Tesla customers, some of which will be highlighted in Chapter 8 of the Aaron Greenspan story.
Please join us in praying that Think Computer Foundation and all those involved will face justice for their criminal harassment campaign very soon.
It's been quite a journey for Elon Musk's No. 1 fan.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) February 7, 2021
Left: 2019
Right: 2021 pic.twitter.com/23HswTjUFq
Omar, is that you?
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) January 14, 2019
Ladies and gentlemen, with 99% certainty based on IP address, Model 3 ownership, and location, presenting Omar Qazi (@OmarQazi), the "failure" pretending to be Steve Jobs (@tesla_truth).
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) January 14, 2019
Make that 99.5% certainty. Seemed strange that "Steve Jobs" picked up his Model 3 at the Tesla Service Center in Torrance, CA near Los Angeles, yet photographed himself at a car wash near San Jose. Yet on Omar's LinkedIn profile… pic.twitter.com/AjWhoXiRsh
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) January 14, 2019
And then you have "Steve Jobs" searching PlainSite for Omar Qazi's company, Smick Enterprises. (Are there any lawsuits against you that you'd like to tell us about, Omar?) pic.twitter.com/oUoAhqn5Md
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) January 14, 2019
Omar sayeth, "Elonu Akbar!"
— 1205/1207 (@Araphatso) January 14, 2019
Wow @tesla_truth you really hit a nerve with @PlainSite 😂😂😂
— Kim Paquette 💫🦄 (@kimpaquette) January 14, 2019
"We may also release your information when we believe release is appropriate to comply with the law, enforce our site policies, or protect ours or others rights, property or safety."
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) January 14, 2019
First that's a shitty policy.
— The Cornman (@GrainSurgeon) January 14, 2019
Second since they're blocked i cant see what they posted but you'd have a tough time convincing me posting that info is justified by any clause in that dumb policy
You'll note that we did not post his full IP address. We posted one search query from a masked IP address for a company already disclosed on Omar Qazi's profile. We asked Mr. Qazi to stop posting libelous content already the subject of a criminal proceeding. He refused.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) January 14, 2019
It's pretty simple: the policy is posted so you can make a choice. If you don't like the policy, don't use our site. You'll have absolutely nothing to worry about.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) January 14, 2019
There was no mistake here, nor is there some sort of conflict. The disclosure of limited information was appropriate and justified, and our policy allows us that freedom to protect ourselves.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) January 15, 2019
Also you've already lost this argument in the court of public opinion, nobody rushing to defend you here.
— The Cornman (@GrainSurgeon) January 15, 2019
You won't find me defending those troll accounts, their decorum or purpose. They are the worst.
— The Cornman (@GrainSurgeon) January 15, 2019
But I'll stand against doxxing and posting a website user's PII every time.
Question for @Tesla PR and @ElonMusk: is the vitriol coming from Omar Qazi and his fake account (@Tesla_Truth) officially sanctioned? Mr. Qazi appears to have a close enough relationship with someone at Tesla to be invited to events. Is he a brand ambassador? Is he compensated? pic.twitter.com/shwMMJ38mB
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) March 21, 2019
It just seems strange because we blocked Mr. Qazi out of an abundance of caution around January 14, 2019 and haven't written anything about him or his fake account since. The sudden resurgence of anger from him is a little odd.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) March 21, 2019
Of course, if he is being in any way compensated to libel Tesla's critics, that would be a major problem that could result in legal action. And even if he's not, it's still libel and reflects rather poorly on the @Tesla brand.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) March 21, 2019
Strange that a company would allow a third party to make use of its trademarked brand in a social media handle, as well. What tech company doesn't want to be able to rely on trademark dilution arguments? And think of the customer confusion…
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) March 21, 2019
Just wait until $TSLAQ… and you should see what they say about me! Lol
— TC (@TESLAcharts) March 21, 2019
Russ Mitchell's piece on $TSLA's largely anonymous Twitter critics is great. Predictably, it has angered some of the company's fans. One of those is Omar Qazi, who thinks it is "disingenuous" to write one-sided articles. https://t.co/wU9pd40MUG
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) April 8, 2019
But Omar spends a good part of his day operating a fake Twitter account called @Tesla_Truth in the name of Steve Jobs. Much of what Omar writes on this account violates federal and state laws against harassment. He's not the only $TSLA fan who operates like this.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) April 8, 2019
Aside from Omar Qazi as "Steve Jobs", $TSLA critics have been followed by a fake account posing as a Bloomberg reporter using an AI-generated image and the usual smattering of aggressive trolls on Twitter who do everything they can do distract from evidence-based analysis.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) April 8, 2019
The pro-$TSLA bot network at work. pic.twitter.com/Irc3CHcRoF
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) April 9, 2019


Strange, it would appear that the owner of this $TSLA Model 3—likely Omar Qazi, the owner of the account that posted the video—is improperly using Autopilot hands-free. He even ignores an on-screen warning while driving at 1100 South La Brea Avenue. https://t.co/6pnADwA8KO
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 3, 2019
The video also appears to show the driver running a red light. Below, a photo of Mr. Qazi's black Tesla Model 3 posted previously, consistent with the vehicle in the video. pic.twitter.com/vvTg1PWpjD
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 3, 2019
Omar Qazi, a $TSLA "influencer" hiding behind a non-parody "parody account," continues to make false statements to his thousands of followers daily. Here's one. https://t.co/DTUmmefLbK
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 7, 2019
(There was no restraining order court date this week and there never was.)
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 7, 2019
On Saturday, August 3rd, Qazi sent text messages to PlainSite founder @AaronGreenspan threatening to file a false police report against him about child pornography possession. He followed up minutes later with a pornographic fax. pic.twitter.com/hzUy39mMPk
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 7, 2019
The same fax number was used to threaten @Paul_M_Huettner in December. https://t.co/Oqi1ixMfmZ
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 7, 2019
Qazi also posted a court document that he doctored with a false allegation of an arrest. This was confirmed by PlainSite server logs as having been downloaded by Qazi 17 minutes before it was posted. He later deleted the post. pic.twitter.com/EjOg0RRdZ5
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 7, 2019
Qazi also posted—and then deleted—an admission. pic.twitter.com/qV5l8tocWQ
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 7, 2019




Tell us, Omar. How did you come across that copy? We all want to know. https://t.co/k0PHMj0SPS
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 9, 2019
“when I managed to get a copy he assumed Tesla leaked it to me”
— Justin (@Trumpery45) August 9, 2019
How else would he “manage” to get a copy ?
Omar Qazi is a liar. Left, he claims not to have forged "any legal documents" as of August 8th. Right, the forged legal document he posted to his fake account August 3rd. The initial Form CH-100 he downloaded was not against a child named "Little Biilly [sic] Watkins," age 5. pic.twitter.com/nJt5yXXXJV
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 11, 2019
Fifteen minutes after this bizarre child-focused forgery was posted, the two SMS messages about child pornography arrived at 8:22 AM. Then the fax from "Kids R Us" at 8:29 AM.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 11, 2019
He also claims to have no affiliation with or compensation from Tesla, Inc. But he photographed himself holding a Tesla event guest pass (which has nominal monetary value) and boasts about knowing how to get to Elon Musk's office. pic.twitter.com/NfxS8ZCgSt
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 11, 2019
wtf lol
— One of Elon's hemorrhoids (@kaffeedosenfil1) August 11, 2019
These cultists truely have some problems and should not be able to run around free but wear a white jacket living in a padded cell without internet

Omar Qazi, the man behind this "fan" "parody" "comedy" "commentary" account, is pushing a stock. Using the name of a deceased icon. With no clear disclaimers. He has numerous other accounts and 5 criminal charges (never convicted). And he's very concerned about manipulation. pic.twitter.com/ogcy3rv3IE
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 16, 2019
Omar Qazi's brain: I have been charged with 5 crimes already in my life and I have been accused of sending death threats and pornography to $TSLA critics. Why stop now? I'll encourage others to send hate mail. https://t.co/cDpEEuejAT
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 21, 2019
Fact check: Whether or not one thinks it's frivolous, $TSLA brought Randeep Hothi to court. Not the other way around. https://t.co/QmfSWiOPI7
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 25, 2019
(For those who can't see, using one of his fake accounts, Omar Qazi wrote, "That'll teach those assholes to bring frivolous litigation to court.")
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 25, 2019

Omar Qazi (@tesla_truth)'s PlainSite profile is here: https://t.co/cDpEEuejAT
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 2, 2019
In which Elon Musk's proxy, Omar Qazi, while fully on notice of the context, willingly spreads libel and disinformation posted by a convicted murderer (in violation of a restraining order) even further. pic.twitter.com/fWgtAVnyX9
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 9, 2019
There's no such thing as a "fake petition." Either a petition is granted or it's denied. And it's hardly a violation of any law to exercise one's right to petition the federal government as a citizen. A former NASA employee should know that, if anything.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 20, 2019
It's possible a petition might contain false information. But it's not clear how Omar would have any idea what it is in the petition someone else filed, and he hasn't alleged any false statements. So it's really unclear what any of you are talking about.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 20, 2019
As for stock price manipulation, proper federal oversight of commercial activity doesn't even come close to "manipulation."
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 20, 2019
World is on fire and you waste your time fighting Tesla owners. Fight for something worthwhile (sustainability) I almost feel sorry for losers like you.
— Louis Botelho (@Louisbotelho17) September 21, 2019
Morgan Stanley is very much aware that Elon Musk's buddy, Omar Qazi, has a serious drug problem that has brought him before a judge. Will that fact make it into the next $TSLA analyst report? Or does that not count as a material risk for the CEO of a government contractor?
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 27, 2019
Unable to resist an opportunity to affirmatively endorse harassment, Omar Qazi just posted and deleted a screenshot of the above post with the comment, "I didn't do this (in case Aaron tries to blame me), but shoutout to whoever did." His post was at https://t.co/Z6gzz6mTBP.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 30, 2019
$TSLA social media influencer Omar Qazi is very likely responsible for @PlainShite, a fake account misappropriating the PlainSite name and logo to spread false information and libel. It was previously linked to a phone number ending with the same last two digits as his cell.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 8, 2019
As this law firm summary of the Lanham Act case law around the issue indicates, trademark parody is a tricky thing. https://t.co/Xxs2JBATmx
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 8, 2019
what a sad human being he is…
— Jung Tusk (@shortshorts90) October 8, 2019
This was done with Teslacharts and Mark Spiegel as well, parody accounts are still up. More along, or keep your panties in a bunch.
— 🚢Morten Grove – Tesla-Ships Tracker 🚢🕵️♂️🚗 (@mortenlund89) October 8, 2019
It's a parody, get over it. When you're busy throwing knives in the backs of people like you are, you should really have thicker skin.
— Techgnostik 🖖🏼🌏 (@Techgnostik) October 8, 2019
hahahahahahahaha! Get over yourself.
— Serious Callers Only (@EthicsGradient) October 8, 2019
Are you going to sue?
— $TSLAQ is a crowdsourced short and distort (@ElectroCar) October 8, 2019
Zach Mider and Dana Hull just got played. They were incredibly close to the real story, but managed to avoid writing it. The real story is that Omar Qazi has Elon Musk's enthusiastic support (noted by Bloomberg) because Omar is the patsy. The front man. The fall guy.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 9, 2019
We already knew that Autopilot will inevitably avoid some casualties. And both Zach and Dana already knew—and were warned repeatedly—that Omar Qazi was highly unreliable as a source. But Bloomberg plowed ahead with a piece awfully close to corporate propaganda. That's a shame.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 9, 2019
We've known since January 14, 2019 that Omar Qazi was behind the infamous @tesla_truth Twitter account, which to date has pumped out about 38,800 tweets defending a sociopathic billionaire and his various enterprises,—but mostly $TSLA. https://t.co/DNYzuQXuby
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 9, 2019
Elon and his comms team could not have been more pleased that we figured this out, as it solved a problem. An SEC problem, which forbade Musk from using Twitter to comment on material aspects of Tesla's business. An SEC problem that already saw him dragged back to court once.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 9, 2019
Now, multiple people could use the @tesla_truth account while Omar Qazi, an unaffiliated relative nobody car enthusiast and very public happy customer, got all of the credit and blame. Multiple people, including someone named Jim.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 9, 2019
How do we know? Omar said so. We received these direct messages involving Omar some time ago. In them, he admits to making a harassing call to PlainSite founder @AaronGreenspan three days after PlainSite revealed his identity. He also admits that "Steve Jobs" is sometimes "Jim." pic.twitter.com/jAMnB3zOWR
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 9, 2019
Who is Jim? One name appears prominently in e-mail threads as a PR crisis unfolded in Thailand: SpaceX Director of Communications James Gleeson. We don't know if "Jim" has access to the @tesla_truth account, or if several of Musk's PR employees do, but it posts non-stop. pic.twitter.com/k4q9FfmSla
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 9, 2019
If you'd like to comment as to whether or not you've ever had access to the @tesla_truth account @gleesonjm, we'd love to hear. If not, we'd like to know who Jim actually is. If so, we'd like to know how that isn't another violation of the SEC consent decree signed by Elon Musk.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 9, 2019
The @tesla_truth account *frequently* discusses $TSLA stock, production figures, and other material aspects of Tesla's business. It interacts regularly with the @ElonMusk account. And it never stops talking. Omar Qazi is not nearly diligent enough to run such an operation alone.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 9, 2019
As for Gleeson, he says it himself. His job is to always be "pushing E's latest tweets." The question is: from how many accounts? And if not ones with clear disclosures, in violation of how many laws and regulations?
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 9, 2019
There would obviously be violations of securities law. But beyond that, there would be violations of libel law, as the @tesla_truth account has gratuitously libeled numerous critics of Elon Musk. It spent the day yesterday misinterpreting quotes from @AaronGreenspan's book.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 9, 2019
This is a strategic blunder by Musk's staff to the extent they are involved (and whoever Jim is, they do appear to be involved). Because a simple libel suit by @AaronGreenspan against @OmarQazi could then bring the whole "pyramid" crashing down.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 9, 2019
If this is all wrong, $TSLA PR can come out and simply affirm that no employee of any Musk company has ever, at any point, had any access whatsoever to the @tesla_truth account. It will be hard to believe, but they can do that. Let's see if they do with @SEC_Enforcement watching.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 9, 2019
And One More Thing: attempting to equate Elon Musk with Steve Jobs in the first place is an obvious PR spin move, and not likely one conceived of by Omar Qazi. It is far more plausible that this entire scheme was hatched in its original form by one of Musk's paid PR shops.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 9, 2019
Elon Musk, his companies, and Omar Qazi are officially on notice that they should preserve evidence because a libel case may be coming their way. Elon Musk responded with more libel, which was then immediately posted publicly by Omar Qazi, who then encouraged further harassment. pic.twitter.com/ivVpLDBi7o
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 9, 2019
The Regional Director of the San Francisco office of @SF_SEC was CCed on all of these messages.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 10, 2019
The lack of response from @danahull on this has been disheartening for me. I know she had to know better — yet, here we are.
— Jordan Wells (@JordanWells33) October 9, 2019
I held Bloomberg up much higher than most on my trusted list. Taking a big hit here, sadly.$TSLA $TSLAQ
Elon Musk, his companies, and Omar Qazi are officially on notice that they should preserve evidence because a libel case may be coming their way. Elon Musk responded with more libel, which was then immediately posted publicly by Omar Qazi, who then encouraged further harassment. pic.twitter.com/ivVpLDBi7o
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 9, 2019
The Regional Director of the San Francisco office of @SF_SEC was CCed on all of these messages.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 10, 2019
Blocked.
— Everyone Says ‘Hi’ (@EveryoneSaysHi1) October 10, 2019
Absolute savage
— CIA (comrade in america) (@ChiefAdrian_) October 10, 2019
I place my bets that this will ultimately get nowhere in the courts but I hope I am wrong
You’re a joke
— #LongLiveTeslaTruth (@ElonsWorld) October 10, 2019
If it can be reasonably proven that you should be in a psych ward is it really libel?
— “Mary” (@kulpability) October 10, 2019
Oooo. “On notice??” I’m sure they’re scared now. What a dumpster fire $TSLAQ has become.
— futuretech (@futuret00175649) October 10, 2019
Do you even realize that they have all the power to bring you to court with all the trouble you are doing to Elon and Tesla but knowing your background they just don't want to waste time with all your nonsense?
— VirtusT (@VirtusT) October 10, 2019
I hope you figure that out because your gonna be in trouble 😬
Don’t stop there #DumDum. Keep going. 😂 pic.twitter.com/TCbdBcgpfJ
— Bark 🧦🐶🕺🏼🪑 (@BarkMSmeagol) October 9, 2019
I hope you lose your shirt in the process of this frivolous lawsuit.
— 4680 CYBER FXR (@DatHandsomeJerk) October 10, 2019
First off, none of Elon’s companies have written, spoken, tweeted, etc. libel against you. That will be immediately grown out.
Now, you’re left with Elon, billionaire, and Omar Qazi. This is so weak. Stop.
What is wrong with you?
— Brandon Paddock (@BrandonLive) October 10, 2019
fuck em up, aaron
— I, Capulet (@icapulet) October 10, 2019
This is a hilarious blog of butthurt whining.
— Speculawyer 🇳🇴-American (@speculawyer) October 10, 2019
Why are you such a loser?
— Pete Clay (@Pete_Clay) October 10, 2019



Omar is sorry for making a false accusation. But what about the months of criminal harassment, the two websites targeting @AaronGreenspan's family, the DMCA violations, the Lanham Act violations, the libel, and the false advertising on behalf of Elon Musk? https://t.co/J9mTvtY6FI
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 14, 2019
Also, what about the numerous fake Twitter accounts linked to Qazi's company's domain name and cell phone, the attacks on journalists, the mocking of disabled people, the pornographic faxes, the destruction of evidence, and the solicitation of harassment by others?
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 14, 2019
And he's still at it. If you'd like to entangle yourself in a criminal harassment scheme with an aim toward securities fraud, he'd like you to get in touch. https://t.co/aTHAYae3PE
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 14, 2019
The sites are still up.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 14, 2019
In which Omar Qazi lets us in on a little secret about he runs his disinformation operation. https://t.co/VFMWUkZwp8
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 15, 2019
We sent three blank test e-mails, two to addresses used to make fake accounts on Twitter, and one to a nonsense address, all at the same domain name. All were received.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 15, 2019
This catch-all forwarding rule allows the owner of the domain name, which in this case belongs to Qazi's company, to rapidly register fake social media accounts as there's no need for a corresponding e-mail account to exist first.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 15, 2019
(Typo above: about *how* he runs…)
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 15, 2019
At least that much is clear. https://t.co/nVkIF95XeO
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 15, 2019
After spewing harassing garbage content and corporate propaganda for months, Omar Qazi's @tesla_truth account has been suspended by Twitter.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 22, 2019


DMCA takedowns work. Use them
— BertelSchmitt™ 🎩🎩🎩🎩🎩 (@BertelSchmitt) October 22, 2019




Along with Omar Qazi, Elon Musk is named in a declaration regarding criminal harassment filed with the San Francisco Police Department on October 10, 2019.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 25, 2019
No, that would be at the Tokyo Metro police department
— BertelSchmitt™ 🎩🎩🎩🎩🎩 (@BertelSchmitt) October 26, 2019
This also mattered because between September 19, 2019 and October 24, 2019, $TSLA's advocates, led by Omar Qazi, escalated a campaign of criminal harassment against @AaronGreenspan and his entire family, which has been well documented.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 26, 2019
Aaron's parents are on Think Computer Foundation's Board of Directors. And $TSLA's entire Board of Directors was made aware of Mr. Qazi's problematic behavior on Tesla's behalf on August 7, 2019. (They never responded directly or through counsel.)
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 26, 2019
Then on October 9th, Bloomberg published its AutoPilot story profiling Mr. Qazi, in which Elon Musk was on the record encouraging Qazi's behavior. This is problematic, as it shows that Elon Musk was aware of and encouraging of criminal harassment against a party in the DE case.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 26, 2019
In such a situation, most Boards of Directors would force a CEO to resign. Deliberate criminal misconduct cannot be tolerated. Even willful negligence cannot be tolerated. Either way, this is a serious matter, and it's not going away.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 26, 2019
The harassment continues in Qazi's absence. @AaronGreenspan never sued Omar Qazi. And the fact that Aaron developed the initial campus-wide Facebook at Harvard is a point of fact confirmed both by Mark Zuckerberg, who joined it, and the New York Times. https://t.co/1py2IltOBm
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 26, 2019
That of course does not preclude the possibility of this matter going to court in the future.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 26, 2019
Holy fkn wack job.
— ℳ𝒶𝓉𝓉𝒽ℯ𝓌 (@RIPtslaQ) October 27, 2019
Unable to further retaliate on Twitter on behalf of @elonmusk, Omar Qazi last night registered a fourth domain name targeting @AaronGreenspan and his family. He claims to have started the "Victims of Aaron Greenspan Foundation." pic.twitter.com/jWcF0kXN1j
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 27, 2019
The supposed new "testimony" on the site is sourced almost entirely from deranged posts by the individual whom @AaronGreenspan has a restraining order against, who has used over 300 fake accounts on dozens of sites. This could be construed as contempt of court by Mr. Qazi.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 27, 2019
An unknown individual is now trying to sell an iPad on Craigslist that @AaronGreenspan doesn't own and never did, with a post connected to his phone number and e-mail address. (Who would do such a thing?) pic.twitter.com/m9tXoqB7xE
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 27, 2019

Maybe the same person who sent in an e-mail to the @PWC Ethics Line under @AaronGreenspan's name? pic.twitter.com/hoTZuGyHRk
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 27, 2019


The libel campaign continues. This site was set up at 1:30 P.M. today. pic.twitter.com/vXEMHLtz6b
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 27, 2019
Amazon Web Services appears to have de-platformed @ElonMusk acolyte Omar Qazi for repeat legal violations. $TSLA
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) November 5, 2019
It's also possible he quit in protest, but four of his sites are no longer hosted on Amazon's servers. At least one remains on-line. Another uses a different provider.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) November 5, 2019
Was this also "off the cuff," @ElonMusk? Did you just mean "psych ward" in the figurative sense when you sent it to Omar Qazi—now banned from Twitter—who immediately shared it with tens of thousands and encouraged further harassment on your behalf? (Nothing was redacted.) pic.twitter.com/vjBPdpjEOU
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) December 5, 2019
Omar Qazi might want to change the name of the fake non-profit he set up on Elon Musk's behalf: the "Victims of Aaron Greenspan Foundation." https://t.co/i8Lx3gRVP2 https://t.co/4eqf7ezPiO
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) December 7, 2019
Setting aside the wisdom of Qazi's campaign of criminal harassment, Elon Musk—the CEO of a car company—welcomed the marketing efforts of someone previously charged with driving with marijuana, and then arrested six years later on multiple drug charges. Now, practically family. pic.twitter.com/bIelAUa9ID
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) January 7, 2020






This Twitter account isn't run by a non-profit. Meanwhile, Omar Qazi still hasn't registered Smick Enterprises, Inc. with the California Secretary of State or paid taxes to the California Franchise Tax Board. https://t.co/XyPEzfQDC8
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) January 23, 2020
It's not as though he merely forgot. Omar is proud to be a tax evader. "Remember that California minumum tax for an LLC is $800. EVERY YEAR. that is what you have to pay even if you lose money or do nothing." —Omar Qazi, April 10, 2018 https://t.co/beacStIQA6
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) January 23, 2020
And of course, the perfect response: "You do realize if you do business in CA you have to pay CA taxes, right?"
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) January 23, 2020
According to Omar, he is "from California" and has "lived in San Francisco" and has even "had an office on Market Street." But his company doesn't pay California taxes. pic.twitter.com/539T1KAEgB
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) January 23, 2020
Elon Musk and his lackeys (including Omar Qazi) are still pushing the narrative that PlainSite is involved with tax fraud, based on initial claims by a convicted murderer. It is 100% false. Think Computer Foundation was just audited in-depth by the IRS. It passed. End of story. pic.twitter.com/6hqC9iPAwy
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) April 2, 2020
As usual, Elon is wrong about virtually everything he writes on Twitter. https://t.co/2iZhhO19Sz
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) April 2, 2020

Omar Qazi just tried to smear a pro-environmental state legislator by highlighting her "yes" votes for *clamping down on* oil companies. And Elon replied in agreement with "Interesting."
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) May 11, 2020
Talk about being an "idiot." $TSLA https://t.co/6z1XaTAUm2


They were only too willing to encourage and defend Omar Qazi's criminal harassment and brazen securities fraud when it benefitted them as $TSLA shareholders. But now that it's a risk, probably best not to be associated with it, right?
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) May 14, 2020









Greenspan v. Qazi et al: https://t.co/rirDmceIqg $TSLA
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) May 21, 2020
Three of the four defendants in Greenspan v. Qazi et al have been served. The fourth, Elon Musk, refused to return his waiver of service form in a timely manner, which he has done in virtually every other federal case. It puts him on the hook for fees. https://t.co/rirDmceIqg
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) June 22, 2020
Yesterday, Elon Musk was served in person at one of his Los Angeles homes with the first lawsuit to raise the $TSLA $1.2 billion accounts receivable issue, Greenspan v. Qazi et al. https://t.co/rirDmceIqg
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) June 24, 2020
There are new filings, including an Amended Complaint, in Greenspan v. Qazi et al. $TSLA https://t.co/rirDmceIqg
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) July 2, 2020
$TSLA has engaged John C. Dwyer at long-time $FB law firm Cooley LLP to represent Tesla, Inc. and Elon Musk in Greenspan v. Qazi et al. Judge Donato, presiding over the case, previously worked as a litigator at Cooley LLP. https://t.co/rirDmceIqg pic.twitter.com/P75PoabaJw
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) July 9, 2020
More time for Elon & Co. in Greenspan v. Qazi et al. https://t.co/rirDmceIqg $TSLA pic.twitter.com/M2rQ2eMo3N
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) July 15, 2020
In addition to the serious issues outlined in Greenspan v. Qazi et al, a sitting California Assemblywoman's staff was harassed by an unknown individual obsessed with Elon Musk, now facing criminal charges. $TSLA https://t.co/JuYc72rKEx
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) July 16, 2020
$TSLA was also sued in Greenspan v. Qazi et al for failing to inform investors that the company was "achieving" financial metrics by not paying vendors. See Document 20. https://t.co/rirDmceIqg pic.twitter.com/SYN31TW9oU
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) July 16, 2020
$TSLA enthusiast Omar Qazi has engaged the law firm of Kronenberger Rosenfeld, LLP to represent him and his company in court. Today, through counsel, he filed a Motion to Set Aside Default. See Document 44. https://t.co/rirDmceIqg
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) July 16, 2020
$TSLA has filed its Motion to Dismiss in Greenspan v. Qazi et al. Document 56 is the core motion and Documents 57-58 are related.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 1, 2020
Missing on first read-through: any assertion by Tesla or Elon Musk that a single allegation in the lawsuit is inaccurate. https://t.co/rirDmceIqg
This article by @princessdeixa regarding Greenspan v. Qazi has too many errors to fit into 280 characters, starting with the incorrect case number in $TSLA's Motion to Dismiss. https://t.co/qjnWCmAtK7
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 3, 2020
Mr. Dwyer's electronic signature is the only one on the joint $TSLA / Elon Musk Motion to Dismiss in Greenspan v. Qazi et al, right above the incorrect case number. pic.twitter.com/DkP9jzGfEj
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 5, 2020
There is a new filing in Greenspan v. Qazi et al, the lawsuit involving PlainSite's founder concerning $TSLA and Elon Musk. Document 62 (1 page of argument) is a reply to Document 55 (15 pages of argument plus attachments containing evidence). https://t.co/rirDmceIqg
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 6, 2020
Judge Donato just ruled that the PSLRA automatic discovery shall remain in place in Greenspan v. Qazi. If you think large corporations should be subject to discovery rules like anyone else, tell your representatives in Congress to repeal the PSLRA. https://t.co/rirDmceIqg $TSLA
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 7, 2020
Today is Monday. $TSLA is nominally worth $335 billion. No major news outlets have reported on the detailed securities fraud allegations in Greenspan v. Qazi et al. https://t.co/rirDmceIqg
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 17, 2020
$TSLA just changed its counsel in the "Funding Secured" securities litigation. Now Cooley LLP represents Tesla, Inc. and the Board of Directors in that case and Greenspan v. Qazi et al. pic.twitter.com/e6PevSjXci
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 18, 2020
(Only Tesla, Inc. and Elon Musk are defendants in Greenspan v. Qazi et al, not the entire Board.)
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 18, 2020
Lawyers for Omar Qazi have filed a Motion to Dismiss, Anti-SLAPP Motion, and over 300 pages of exhibits in Greenspan v. Qazi et al. https://t.co/rirDmceIqg $TSLA
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 19, 2020
PlainSite founder @AaronGreenspan has filed a Motion for Sanctions against Omar Qazi, his company, and his lawyers at Kronenberger Rosenfeld LLP. https://t.co/rirDmceIqg $TSLA
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 20, 2020
$TSLA's auditors at PricewaterhouseCoopers are not only aware of the allegations of accounting and securities fraud in Greenspan v. Qazi, but as of today, they're reading the Second Amended Complaint. They have no choice. Their regulators at the PCAOB were CCed on the e-mail.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) August 28, 2020
Greenspan v. Qazi et al Securities Fraud Issue No. 9: Selling used $TSLA vehicles as "new." https://t.co/rirDmceIqg https://t.co/ChEyvNXnNK
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 1, 2020
Greenspan v. Qazi et al Securities Fraud Issue No. 36: Routine theft of $TSLA raw materials (via @VickiBryanBondA) https://t.co/rirDmceIqg https://t.co/zilq11ikUR
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 1, 2020
Greenspan v. Qazi et al Securities Fraud Issue No. 4: Dark design patterns (a la @chopraftc) causing consumers to accidentally spend thousands of dollars on needless and fake software features, also known as conversion, or theft. https://t.co/rirDmceIqg https://t.co/eKg4IMlHgg
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 3, 2020
In Greenspan v. Qazi today, the judge issued an order requiring cooperation and professional conduct from all parties and their attorneys to avoid needless filings going forward, and lawyers responded to a motion for sanctions. https://t.co/rirDmceIqg
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 3, 2020
Yesterday, lead counsel for Elon Musk and $TSLA called to discuss their next motion to dismiss, and said that there is no way that Elon Musk or Tesla, Inc. could be seen as endorsing Omar Qazi's views. No pattern.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 12, 2020
This morning, they're once again pumping the stock as a team. pic.twitter.com/Gqc6SFWeZe
There is one Tesla owner, Omar Qazi, who is one of several defendants in a civil lawsuit due to his unlawful conduct on a number of grounds. Document 70 is the operative complaint. https://t.co/rirDmbX7yI
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 18, 2020
Has Omar Qazi really engaged counsel to consult on his campaign of harassment against those he perceives to be enemies of Elon Musk generally? Previously, he was only raising funds for "Legal Defense Against Aaron Greenspan." Who is "counsel?" E-mail posted by @FredericLambert. pic.twitter.com/mKjuB42Vlr
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 21, 2020
Either Omar has engaged mystery "counsel," or he is lying.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 21, 2020
His only known counsel denies having made the representation in the e-mail to Frederic Lambert. pic.twitter.com/XCAtKaWjv9
As of a few minutes ago, Omar Qazi is putting PlainSite founder @AaronGreenspan's family in danger. Please report the @WholeMarsBlog account to @TwitterSafety.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 25, 2020
False. This is totally delusional. @AaronGreenspan is afraid someone will show up at his home or his family's home with a gun because of the lies Omar Qazi has posted on social media for nearly two years. pic.twitter.com/OUDspdX500
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 25, 2020
very sorry you are dealing with this guy on this level, have the authorities provided you any benefit at all?
— Nospin (@Nospin9) September 25, 2020
Nope. There is zero in that screencap re danger to anyone or anything. Anyone who sees this post can clearly see that and that you are vastly spinning it. And these are very serious allegations you're making right now.
— Lisa #TeslaTruth (@TeslaLisa) September 25, 2020
Later today, $TSLA, Elon Musk, Omar Qazi, and Qazi's company Smick Enterprises, Inc. should be filing their respective motions to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint in Greenspan v. Qazi et al. https://t.co/rirDmceIqg
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 25, 2020
Less than 24 hours after publicly (and privately) expressing concern over the risk that @AaronGreenspan might be shot thanks to Omar Qazi's harassing, libelous rhetoric, his lawyers file this: pic.twitter.com/EyThXEvtz7
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 25, 2020
It's a small world after all. Remember Bradley Bondi? He was, at least very recently, Elon Musk's lawyer.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 26, 2020
And he just sent Omar Qazi an evidence preservation notice on behalf of former $NKLA executive Trevor Milton. https://t.co/HMoCf3b04q
Here's the letter posted by Mr. Qazi himself. It's not clear exactly which "pending litigation" matter the letter references. pic.twitter.com/cwL4VCQOXg
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 26, 2020
(Someone should really break the news to him that despite the nonsense he's telling his followers, it's not a threat to sue, or anything remotely close.)
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 26, 2020
Will in the end Omar take one for 'the team'? 😉
— G Schelle (@g_schelle) September 26, 2020
Dude take it all the time, from Elon
— Corey (@trader51) September 26, 2020
$TSLA and Elon Musk's response to the most detailed securities fraud allegations alleged to date, as well as Omar Qazi's response to the allegations against him and his company, are now posted. https://t.co/rirDmceIqg
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 26, 2020
Omar Qazi is attempting to manufacture support for his cause. This image is from a year ago. Note the sequential case number, which starts with 01289… That's where Twitter Support cases were on about October 11, 2019. pic.twitter.com/1YDhXrEacX
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 28, 2020
Greenspan v. Qazi et al has been updated with a Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why Kronenberger Rosenfeld LLP and Defendants Omar Qazi and Smick Enterprises, Inc. Should Not Be Held In Contempt Of Court. https://t.co/rirDmceIqg $TSLA
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 29, 2020
Elon Musk's recently-filed Answer in the Hothi litigation is a remarkable document in so many ways. To start with, he rips the use of GoFundMe in litigation, and especially the use of anonymous donors.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 4, 2020
His co-defendant Omar Qazi in Greenspan v. Qazi et al uses both. pic.twitter.com/cLhw6NIz7D
He equates short sellers with Russian disinformation agents—perhaps because @AaronGreenspan first made the same analogy in the opposite direction in litigation against Musk and Qazi a month ago. pic.twitter.com/AOsNpGTm6h
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 4, 2020
How does Omar post content to the @WholeMarsBlog Twitter account if it belongs to you?
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 6, 2020
It seems that @WholeMarsBlog and @scottpidity cannot agree on who actually controls the shared @WholeMarsBlog account, which is in the middle of a federal lawsuit. Omar says it's his on podcasts. Then tonight, Scott says no, it's actually mine, on Omar's blog.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 6, 2020
This is why. pic.twitter.com/LZGyqmpDYB
At this point, there is no excuse for a Bloomberg journalist re-tweeting Omar Qazi or using Omar Qazi as a source (left). He makes provably false statements dozens of times per day. In fact, he just made another (right). And the statement she re-tweeted is unverified. pic.twitter.com/YMD66gCnA0
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 6, 2020
If Dana wants to work in corporate PR, she should work in corporate PR.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 6, 2020
This is not what real journalism looks like.
No excuse.
Here's a simple rule: if you are a journalist, do not rely upon sources who harass journalists.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 6, 2020
Get a life @danahull
— NDR, the Machine in the Ghost Capital (@NegDiscountRt) October 6, 2020
And minutes later, another example of why journalists should not cite Omar Qazi. Including Bloomberg's Dana Hull.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 6, 2020
A $TSLA PR play in four acts: pic.twitter.com/Xi3DRiNeGT
Greenspan v. Qazi et al has been updated with a response to motions to dismiss by $TSLA, Elon Musk, Omar Qazi, and Smick Enterprises, Inc., as well as a response to an anti-SLAPP motion under California law. See Documents 80-82. https://t.co/rirDmceIqg
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 16, 2020
This is what happens when people believe Omar Qazi's lies about $TSLA and about PlainSite. https://t.co/iCPTwNUcyt
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 19, 2020
Clearly, you do believe Omar Qazi then. PlainSite has no connection to Martin Tripp. Neither does @AaronGreenspan.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 19, 2020
Obviously harassment of anyone, male or female, is not okay. That is why Omar Qazi is in court for libel and harassment, among other violations of law. And however unwittingly, you are now part of it.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 19, 2020
You said @PlainSite and @AaronGreenspan had some connection to Martin Tripp. You said that because Omar Qazi said that. Omar Qazi is lying.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 19, 2020
It sure looks like you were replying directly to Omar Qazi's account.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 19, 2020
OK. So you found Omar Qazi's tweet in the search results and replied to it. Which still means you believed what he was saying.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 19, 2020
And it means you figure out who those people are by trusting what Omar Qazi writes on Twitter. Even when he's wrong.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 19, 2020
This video clip, shared moments ago (again) by Omar Qazi, is from a memorial service for Aaron Swartz. Imagine abusing a person's grief over a friend's avoidable suicide to try to hurt them.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 19, 2020
What kind of person does that? https://t.co/AjLOHI1UU5
If you don't know who Aaron Swartz is, his work made PlainSite possible, and Think Computer Foundation helped fund a movie about his life, which you can watch for free here: https://t.co/WNuFBj7S0P
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 19, 2020
Again, why would anyone laugh at any part of a person's memorial service? https://t.co/O5Ae9Wox5A
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 20, 2020
When Omar Qazi doesn't like what court documents have to say, he paints PlainSite as an "evil" influence that must be stopped. But when it suits him, he uses a VPN to obtain documents we have made public and findable to promote his own causes or attack us. https://t.co/j4xOsKbSiX
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 20, 2020
Someone thinks this is clever. It's not. pic.twitter.com/rLHWPiFJjB
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 20, 2020
1. Omar Qazi knew where the video was from each time he has posted it. Both parts (I & II) are clearly labeled. https://t.co/a1cbSj6Pk5
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 21, 2020
2. PlainSite is *directly based* on the work of Aaron Swartz. The first 760K cases came from his PACER data.https://t.co/ck72RvjeuM
3. It was entirely appropriate to promote a free tool at Aaron Swartz's memorial service that would make use of the PACER data he published to ensure accountability for the USAO that prosecuted his case and indirectly led to the memorial service in the first place.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 21, 2020
4. Qazi posted these videos—again, knowing where they were from—carefully cropped to ensure that no one would understand the context. He has done this before with cropped images as well. In one of his screeds, he cropped an e-mail to give a completely false impression. pic.twitter.com/raRrQD8I0L
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 21, 2020
5. Qazi has admitted openly that these actions are part of a campaign to get "louder" "until [@AaronGreenspan] drops the lawsuit." This is witness tampering, which is a federal crime. 18 U.S.C. § 1512. It may also be obstruction of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 1503. pic.twitter.com/8p59DDomuY
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 21, 2020
That's not just our opinion. It's a federal judge's. https://t.co/MxGMstHUCo pic.twitter.com/iuhvCr5OiI
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 21, 2020
More disinformation. The Rule 34 Requests for Production were sent in July. They were only filed on the docket in August when the defendants refused to comply nominally due to the PSLRA. They are not new. Qazi is the only one who has posted their contents on Twitter.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 21, 2020
When Qazi posted the images most recently, he cropped the date from the PACER header. When he posted them the first time, he deliberately made public what was intended to be non-public.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 21, 2020
This is no way to run a publicly traded company. (From Greenspan v. Qazi Document 70-22, Page 47.) $TSLA pic.twitter.com/5TCNGteMhe
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 21, 2020
Interesting that in the @TwitterSafety notice, it states, "Note that if you attempt to evade a permanent suspension by creating new accounts, we will suspend your new accounts." This is exactly what Omar Qazi did with Scott Woods's help. Twitter did nothing. And @vijaya knows.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 23, 2020
The docket for Greenspan v. Qazi et al has been updated with a Motion for Sanctions involving a baseless anti-SLAPP filing and false statements to the court by Kronenberger Rosenfeld LLP on behalf of Omar Qazi and his company. https://t.co/rirDmceIqg
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 26, 2020
In which Omar Qazi attacks @AaronGreenspan for discussing the reality of caring for someone with severe disabilities, by misattributing quotations. "But comments" refers to comments by completely different people. https://t.co/fXA2vWgwbl
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 28, 2020
This comment is part of a pattern of libelous speech that also violates a court order. A hearing is currently scheduled for November 5, 2020 that may determine whether Mr. Qazi is held in contempt of court.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 28, 2020
The contempt of court hearing is Thursday at 10:00 A.M. Pacific Time. https://t.co/GvOKsS4Dzv
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) November 2, 2020
The hearing on the issue of Omar Qazi's possible contempt of court has been vacated, which means the motion will be decided on the papers. Most likely, it will be decided at the same time as the Motions to Dismiss, but could be decided at any time. More deadlines on 6th and 9th.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) November 3, 2020
Omar Qazi's Reply to @AaronGreenspan's Opposition to his Motions to Strike and Dismiss in Greenspan v. Qazi et al starts as follows. You can read the entire filing, Document 86, at https://t.co/rirDmceIqg. $TSLA pic.twitter.com/C7dTszKRUq
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) November 6, 2020
Here, Qazi attempts to turn California's Anti-SLAPP statute on its head by arguing that silencing a critic of a billionaire through years of harassment is OK because the harassment is "of public interest," meaning, popular on Twitter. This would set a dangerous precedent. pic.twitter.com/570nab3sD4
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) November 7, 2020
Qazi has no coherent argument about how his constant harassment furthered the public debate over $TSLA, so he changes the subject. pic.twitter.com/p2CDefNhkd
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) November 7, 2020
Qazi further argues that "100% true" and "true story" do not mean that anyone should believe that what is written is true. The old "true is false" argument. pic.twitter.com/ucOZL9UBCc
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) November 7, 2020
Don’t click on any #PlainShite link. Erin Smearspan will track, stalk, and harass you just like he’s doing to Omar.
— Bark 🧦🐶🕺🏼🪑 (@BarkMSmeagol) November 7, 2020
As $TSLA joins the S&P 500, consider the fact that *zero* major media publications have written a single word about the allegations of accounting and securities fraud, and associated evidence, in Greenspan v. Qazi et al. https://t.co/rirDmceIqg
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) November 16, 2020
A case study in lawyer's tricks has just been posted as Document 91 in Greenspan v. Qazi et al. https://t.co/rirDmceIqg $TSLA
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) November 16, 2020
In Greenspan v. Qazi et al, @AaronGreenspan just filed a Request for Judicial Notice including Elon Musk's recent tweet about how close $TSLA was to bankruptcy. Either company had the cash it disclosed to investors or it didn't. https://t.co/rirDmceIqg
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) November 20, 2020
A new motion has been filed in Greenspan v. Qazi et al. See Document 96 and attachments. https://t.co/rirDmceIqg $TSLA
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) December 29, 2020
In an impressive self-own, counsel for $TSLA super-fan Omar Qazi admits that his client:
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) December 31, 2020
A) doesn't pay required CA taxes
B) has committed a crime separate and apart from tax evasion
C) could owe $38,520 in fines at $20 per day for 1,926 days
D) has no excuse for any of the above pic.twitter.com/Erd3kPKCyc
In an argument that should make Elon Musk proud, Qazi's counsel invokes an outdated precedent that argues that cheating a little is punishable, but cheating a lot has no consequence. Previously, counsel attempted to use an outdated version of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. pic.twitter.com/fQx2myCe2i
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) December 31, 2020
Omar Qazi filed another perjurious DMCA takedown request for an image containing no copyright notice that is not registered with the United States Copyright Office whose posting constituted fair use. Again. pic.twitter.com/3sY3X7QzbV
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) January 5, 2021
We have filed another DMCA counter-notification with Twitter (which failed to respond to the first two despite its own policy based on 17 U.S.C. § 512). Qazi filed this in retaliation for a DMCA notice filed against him last night, as he copied 30+ passages from a book verbatim.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) January 5, 2021
It remains to be seen whether Vijaya will allow Donald to pull an Omar Qazi and use "Kayleigh's" account for a few minutes a day and then vanish. https://t.co/nz6gMXi1Dp
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) January 8, 2021
PLAINSITE VIOLATING PRIVACY LAWS? thread
— The Cornman (@GrainSurgeon) January 9, 2020
ANSWER FIRST: If you access Plainsite's website, you are at risk of having your private information disclosed, possibly illegally. Do not use, at least without a vpn
Detail: Various federal and state laws govern website privacy.. $tslaq
Who is/are the specific individual(s) who operate(s) the @thirdrowtesla account?
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) January 23, 2020
As of October 2020, Twitter has a new "Ban Evasion Policy." @vijaya, @TwitterSupport and @TwitterSafety should start enforcement with @WholeMarsBlog, formerly @OmarQazi and @tesla_truth; and @scottpidity, who created the new account to evade the ban. https://t.co/lDk6762kpl
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 29, 2020
Twitter Safety suspended fake account @PlaneSightt in a matter of days.@WholeMarsBlog lives on.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) October 9, 2020
Despite repeated polite requests, three iterations of the complaint in the federal lawsuit, and multiple notices to his lawyers, he is re-posting false and dangerous material authored by a restrained party who is already facing criminal harassment charges due to that material.
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 25, 2020
Who used the @thirdrowtesla Twitter account the most, @Sofiaan? Who wrote the actual posts in question, causing this uproar? Simple questions. $TSLA https://t.co/RlRNtBtAvx
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) May 15, 2020
A PR firm Elon & Tesla hire.
— Greenhouse Gas (@GasGreenhouse) January 23, 2020
Omar for sure
— Bobo (@Bobocr1) January 24, 2020
You mean, kind of like…a…a Third Row Tesla? $TSLA
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) September 15, 2020
Tesla's zealots cite "49 U.S.C. 30166(o)" and the "Moving Ahead for Progress Act of 2012." But 49 U.S.C. § 30166(o) applies to *corporations* *responding* to "a safety defect or compliance investigation." In other words, $TSLA could be fined for lying. https://t.co/2vQSDdgQST
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) January 20, 2020
Here's what the statute—which Third Row Tesla didn't bother to read—actually says. Note the title: Corporate Responsibility For Reports. pic.twitter.com/kIRa79tFSs
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) January 20, 2020
Aaron Greenspan (Using full name to help Uncle Google) reminds me of an angry old man who just goes on and on about the same stuff every day. I have some ideas which might be good hobbies:
1. Be the first to build a website that connects people together online.
2. Start a charity that isn’t actually charitable but files petty lawsuits that go nowhere.
3. Setup a new clothing line. Shirts are a good one. People love purple, go with that first.
Now I feel unclean for offering him advice.
Anyway, so I read the tweets, got bored after 42.0 though. Skipped to 69 (or was it 70?) and that’s all about pornographic faxes and stuff so I skimmed through the rest and checked my fax machine to see if I had anything exciting to read tonight. Sadly, no faxes since 1983.
I do have some advice though (Like Aaron Greenspan I am not a lawyer and my legal knowledge is worse than my punctuation? (. > Number 219 is not actually an Arron Greenspan tweet, unless you think he likes corn? You might want to remove that one in case he sues you for something. Actually, let him sue you. Can the court case be live streamed? I’ll pay to watch.
On to something more serious now. I heard a rumour that Jim is not happy about being dragged into this AT ALL, I suppose we will hear more in chapter 8?
hahahaha yes I heard that too
TMI. Keep up the pressure!
This out of control mentally disturbed individual is just so envious, greedy, jealous and has a sick obsession with data mining his targeted victims personal and legal documents for decades. One does not have to be a Psychiatrist to see that this individual is not fit to be roaming freely on our streets, and needs to be receive a judicial order to keep this crazy person off the Internet, Smart Devices and plainsite.org needs to be shut down by a court order or law enforcement.